EFFECT OF PROBIOTIC FEED ADDITIVE BIO-SUBLICH ON BROILER CHICKENS PRODUCTIVITY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The objective of the study is to determine the effect of the probiotic supplement BIO-SUBLICH on opti-mizing broiler feeding to improve their performance. The experiment was conducted at the production and technological complex of the Belgorod State Agricultural University named after V.Ya. Gorin. The floor-based poultry house is equipped with all modern equipment. Ten postgraduate students have been trained there over the past period, and five candidate dissertations have been defended to date. Four groups of birds were formed for the experiment, each consisting of 35 individuals. The control group received the basic diet without the probiotic supplement BIO-SUBLICH. The first experimental group received the basic diet with BIO-SUBLICH added at a rate of 0.17 %, the second group received 0.1 %, and the third group received 1.17 % of the total feed. Complete feed was supplied to the production and technological com-plex by the Plempticereproduktor Majskij feed mill (manufactured by Belgrankorm). During the experiment, broiler chickens in the experimental groups that used the new probiotic feed additive demonstrated positive dynamics in terms of livestock survival rates from 94.2 to 100 %, and live weight gain: by 2.86 % (1st experimental group), by 1.23 % (2nd experimental group), and by 0.36 % (3rd experimental group) compared to the control group (without the inclusion of BIO-SUBLICH in the diet). By 39 days of age, the average daily gain of broiler chickens in the first experimental group exceeded that of chickens in the con-trol group by 2.89 %, and feed costs were 3.4 % lower than in the control group, indicating improved eco-nomic performance in poultry production with the use of the BIO-SUBLICH probiotic feed supplement.

Keywords:
probiotic, sorbent, broiler chicken feeding, broiler chicken survival, poultry productivity
References

1. Nikanova DA, Kolodina EN, Dovydenkova MV, et al. Antagonistic activity of fungi of the species Rhodotorula mucilaginosa isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of farm animals. Veterinary medicine and feeding. 2024;6:67-70. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2024-6-15. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FYBRDK.

2. Artamonov IV. Mycotoxins of phytopathogenic fungi and mycotoxicoses: a historical essay (review). Agrarian Science of the Euro-North-East. 2023;5:703-719. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2023.24.5.703-719. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NFIYLU.

3. Kochish II, Trishina YuV, Petrova YuV, et al. Biological value of products of slaughter of broiler chick-ens when used in the diet of domestic feed additives. Poultry and poultry products. 2024;3:42-44. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30975/2073-4999-2024-26-3-42-44. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AQCFYK.

4. Vetokh AN, Volkova NA. Genome-wide associative studies of growth and development of pectoral muscles in chickens of the resource population. Veterinary medicine and feeding. 2024;6:31-34. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2024-6-7. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EDUGSU.

5. Fisinin VI, Lenkova TN, Egorov IA, et al. The influence of various sources of protein and amino acids on the use of gross energy of compound feeds by broilers. Poultry farming. 2024;12:45-50. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.33845/0033-3239-2024-73-12-45-50. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WTARJY.

6. Kosilov VI, Yuldashbaev YuA, Ermolova EM, et al. Broiler probiotics do not affect the productivity of chicken varieties. Nagornaya Science. 2025;2:108-114. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2025-391-02-108-114. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BANQBK.

7. Kundryukova UI, Drozdova LI, Savvateeva OJ, et al. Morphogenesis of ovaries of broiler chickens using the feed additive "Amber chill". Bulletin of KSAU. 2024;6:83-93. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2024-6-83-93. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZWBTRG.

8. Kuevda TA, Zubochenko DV, Ostapchuk PS, et al. Application of Origanum vulgare L. when keeping chickens outdoors as an element of organic poultry farming. Agrarian Science of the Euro-North-East. 2024;2:251-263. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2024.25.2.251-263. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WGTZIY.

9. Savinykh PA, Turubanov NV, Isupov AYu. Determination of optimal technological parameters of a horizontal mixer of loose compound feeds. Agrarian science of the Euro-North-East. 2024;2:293-300. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2024.25.2.293-300. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TBETWK.

10. Tatyanicheva O, Popova O, Khokhlova A, et al. Dry or sprouted: Which is better? Animal Husbandry of Russia. 2022;2:17-19. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.25701/ZZR.2022.02.02.008. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WLKKTA.

11. Ryadinskaya A, Koshchaev I, Lavrinenko K, et al. Increasing the live weight of broilers. Animal hus-bandry of Russia. 2024;1:15-18. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.25701/ZZR.2023.12.12.007. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MGBAJT.

12. Jastrzębska A, Kmieciak A, Gralak Z, et al. Determination of Biogenic Amine Level Variations upon Storage, in Chicken Breast Coated with Edible Protective Film. Foods. 2024;13:958. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13070985.

13. Orkusz A, Rampanti G, Michalczuk M, et al. Impact of Refrigerated Storage on Microbial Growth, Color Stability, and pH of Turkey Thigh Muscles. Microorganisms. 2024;12:1114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12061114.

14. Silva SH, Samba N, Mendes H, et al. Eco-friendly food packaging with chitosan biofilm reinforced with nanocellulose and essential oils. Macromol. 2023;3:704-722. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol3040040.

15. Vertiprahov VG, Selionova MI, Malorodov VV. Tripsin – novyj marker metabolizma u zhivotnyh. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoj sel'skohozyajstvennoj akademii. Biologicheskie nauki. 2023;1:53-58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26897/2949-4710-2023-1-53-58.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?