from 01.01.2012 to 01.01.2024
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
UDC 33
UDC 332
UDC 336
CSCSTI 06.71
The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the tax effects of subsidies to the agro-industrial complex in the regions of the Siberian Federal District to identify and categorize regional patterns of interaction between state support, production volume, and fiscal returns. The objectives of the study included assessing regional differentiation by production volume, subsidies, and tax revenues; calculating indicators of the fiscal effectiveness of support; and identifying factors influencing subsidy effectiveness. The study focused on seven constituent entities of the Siberian Federal District: the Altaii, Krasnoyarsk, Irkutsk, Kemerovo, Novosibirsk, Omsk, and Tomsk Regions. The methodological basis was a comparative analysis and a coefficient method using data from Rosstat, the Federal Tax Service, and regional Ministries of Agriculture for 2020–2024. The results revealed three interaction models. The effective model (Novosibirsk Region) is characterized by a 21.7 % reduction in subsidies with a 24.7 % increase in production and an 8.8-fold increase in tax revenues. Fiscal efficiency here was 0.85 rubles per 1 ruble of subsidies. The balanced model (the Altai Region, the Omsk Region) demonstrates a high total return (0.67 and 0.62 rubles, respectively), but with negative dynamics. The ineffective model (the Krasnoyarsk Region, the Kemerovo Region) demonstrates high subsidy intensity (79.2–99.7 rubles per 1,000 rubles of production value) with a low fiscal return (0.14–0.02 rubles). It was established that the key factor in efficiency is investment in fixed capital, which is confirmed by the abnormally high share of property tax in the Novosibirsk Region (13 % versus 0–4.11 % in other regions). Maximum tax efficiency is achieved by focusing subsidies on investment projects rather than on compensating operating costs. The predominance of personal income tax (67–89 % of the tax structure) indicates the raw materials-based nature of agricultural development. Increasing fiscal returns requires a shift from supporting gross production to stimulating deep processing and technological modernization.
agriculture, government support, subsidies, tax payments, fiscal returns, tax effects
1. Altuhov A.I. Rossiyskiy APK: problemy i puti ih resheniya // Uchet i statistika. 2023. № 4 (72). S. 12–24.
2. Petrikov A.V. Strategicheskie napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya agrarnoy politiki Rossii v usloviyah sankcionnogo davleniya // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obschestva Rossii. 2022. T. 235, № 3. S. 122–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2022-235-3-122-133. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EATOKW.
3. Ushachev I., Maslova V., Chekalin V. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka sel'skogo hozyaystva v Rossii: problemy, puti ih resheniya //APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2018. T. 3. S. 4–12.
4. Zhilyakov D.I. Ocenka dinamiki i effektivnosti gosudarstvennoy podderzhki APK // Agrarnaya nauka v innovacionnom razvitii APK: mat-ly mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Mayskiy, 26–28 noyabrya 2018 g. Mayskiy: Belgorod. gos. agrar. un-t im. V.Ya. Gorina, 2018. S. 56–61. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YYZXBB.
5. Samygin D.Yu. Metodika strategicheskogo planirovaniya effektivnosti gosudarstvennoy podderzhki sel'skogo hozyaystva // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. 2021. T. 16, № 1. S. 86–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2021-1-86-100. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TWPFPL.
6. Klimentova E.A., Dubovickiy A.A. Rezul'tativnost' gosudarstvennoy podderzhki regional'nogo sel'skogo hozyaystva // Ekonomika sel'skohozyaystvennyh i pererabatyvayuschih predpriyatiy. 2020. № 8. S. 36–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31442/0235-2494-2020-0-8-36-41. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UUBXDI.
7. Rykova I.N., Gubanov R.S., Morina V.A. Metodika reytingovoy ocenki effektivnosti gosudarstvennoy podderzhki sel'skogo hozyaystva kak instrument obzora byudzhetnyh rashodov // Vestnik NGIEI. 2022. № 6 (133). S. 81–103. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/2227-9407-2022-6-81-103. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HVENZN.
8. Brylev A.A., Turchaeva I.N. Metodicheskoe soprovozhdenie gosudarstvennoy podderzhki sel'skogo hozyaystva // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2023. № 11. S. 90–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33305/2311-90. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XHNYEU.
9. Fedoskina I.V., Mal'gina A.Yu. Effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya sredstv gospodderzhki s pozicii gosudarstvennoy finansovoy sistemy // Yunost' i znaniya – garantiya uspeha – 2020: sb. nauch. tr. 7-y Mezhdunar. molodezhnoy nauch. konf.: v 3 t., Kursk, 17–18 sentyabrya 2020 g. T. 1. – Kursk: Yugo-Zapadnyy gos. un-t, 2020. S. 233–238. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IKHFXU.
10. Ovsyanko L.A., Ovsyanko A.V. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhki kak sposob smyagcheniya nalogovoy nagruzki // Ustoychivoe razvitie sela, cifrovizaciya i ekonomika APK: mat-ly vseros. (nac.) nauch.-prakt. konf. professorsko-prepodavatel'skogo sostava. – SPb.: Sankt-Peterburg. gos. agrar. un-t, 2023. S. 121–123.
11. Effektivnost' sistemy nalogooblozheniya v ocenkah organov mestnogo samoupravleniya i sub'ektov APK / L.A. Ovsyanko [i dr.] // Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skohozyaystvennyy zhurnal. 2023. № 2. S. 147–153.
12. Borodina T.A., Ovsyanko L.A., Chepeleva K.V. Effektivnost' primeneniya razlichnyh sistem nalogooblozheniya sel'skohozyaystvennymi organizaciyami Krasnoyarskogo kraya // Social'no-ekonomicheskiy i gumanitarnyy zhurnal. 2021. № 4(22). S. 3–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/2500-1825-2021-4-3-19. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XTDPEG.
13. Pavlenko I.V. Effektivnost' gosudarstvennoy podderzhki sel'skogo hozyaystva //Razvitie cifrovoy ekonomiki: teoreticheskaya i prakticheskaya znachimost' dlya APK: mat-ly Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Saratov, 18 noyabrya 2019 g. / pod red. I.V.Sharikovoy. Saratov: CeSAin, 2019. S. 241–244.
14. Kuhtin M.A., Poltaryhin A.L. Ocenka effektivnosti gosudarstvennoy podderzhki sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii po pokazatelyam otnositel'nogo (uslovnogo) pererashoda (ekonomii) // Novaya nauka: istoriya stanovleniya, sovremennoe sostoyanie, perspektivy razvitiya: sb. st. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. V 2 ch. Ch. 1. Kirov, 7 iyunya 2021 g. Ufa: Omena Sayns, 2021. S. 11–15.
15. Rekomendacii po povysheniyu effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo regulirovaniya i stimulirovaniya sel'skogo hozyaystva / I.A. Kazakevich [i dr.] // Nauchnye principy regulirovaniya razvitiya APK: predlozheniya i mehanizmy realizacii. 2022. S. 88–100.
