MODELLING THE CAUSES OF FOOD LOSS IN FRESH TOMATO SUPPLY CHAINS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The aim of the study is to investigate the interactions between the causes of food losses of fresh toma-toes of different colors (brown and crimson) using interpretative structural modeling (ISM). Objectives: analysis of scientific and technical literature to identify the causes of food losses of fresh tomatoes occurring at all stages of the production and distribution chain; conducting two independent sessions of interpretative structural modeling (ISM) - for brown and crimson tomatoes; comparative analysis of the constructed hierarchies and classification matrices of the cross-influence of factors (MICMAC analysis). The object of the study were eleven causes of food losses of fresh tomatoes, identified through the analysis of scientific sources. As a result of the study, all identified causes of food losses were divided into four classes: autonomous, dependent, linking, and independent. It was established that a differentiated approach is necessary for effective food loss management. For brown tomatoes, the priority is to address the key causes of "sorting and calibration errors," "overripe fruit storage," "lack of pre-cooling," and "failure to comply with storage conditions." For raspberry tomatoes, the priority is to address the causes of "sorting and calibration errors" and "overripe fruit sto¬rage." The development of targeted solutions, such as protective coatings, allows for the effective resolution of both stand-alone and critical issues (such as "insufficient protection against pathogens after harvest"), ensuring comprehensive product protection. Strategic investments in targeted technologies, such as protective film-forming coatings and optimization of critical stages (sorting, cooling), enable proactive interventions against identified root causes. This approach will ensure maximum impact in maintaining product quality and increasing the sustainability of the entire fresh tomato production and value chain.

Keywords:
tomatoes, supply chain, food loss, loss causes, interpretive structural modeling, cross-factor influence method, independent causes
References

1. Abera G, Ibrahim AM, Forsido SF, et al. Assessment on post-harvest losses of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentem Mill.) in selected districts of East Shewa Zone of Ethiopia using a commodity system analysis methodology. Heliyon. 2020;6(4):1-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03749.

2. Desta B, Tena N, Amare G. Preharvest Factors that Influence the Quality of Tomato. Asian Journal of Research and Review in Agriculture. 2022;4(1):6-12.

3. Rai A, Kumari Kh, Vashistha P. Umbrella review on chilling injuries: Post-harvest issue, cause, and treatment in tomato. Scientia Horticulturae. 2022;293:110710. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110710.

4. Tadesse EE, Assaye H, Delele MA, et al. Quantitative Postharvest Loss Assessment of Tomato Along the Postharvest Supply Chain in Northwestern Ethiopia. In: 8th EAI International Conference «Advances of Science and Technology: ICAST 2020», 2–4 Oct 2020. Bahir Dar, Ethiopia; 2020. P. 110–122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80621-7_8.

5. Tiwari I, Shah KK, Tripathi S, et al. Post-harvest practices and loss assessment in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in Kathmandu, Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2020;3(2):335-352. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v3i2.32545.

6. Zewdie T, Desaiegn A, Olijira G, et al. Review on effects of pre and post-harvest factors affecting the quality and shelf life of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). South Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2021;1(1):51-56.

7. Asrat F, Ayalew A, Degu A. Postharvest Loss Assessment of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in Fogera, Ethiopia. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology (TUR-JAF). 2019;7(8):1146-1155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i8.1146-1155.2460.

8. Saeed AF, Khan SN. Post harvest losses of tomato in markets of district Lahore. Mycopath. 2010;8(2):97-99.

9. Boiteau JM, Pingali P. Food loss of perishable produce from farm to retail: evidence from tomato sup-ply chains in South India. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2022;115(6):1535-1548. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac039.

10. Kader AA. Effects of postharvest handling procedures on tomato quality. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 190: Symposium on Tomato Production on Arid Land. P. 209–222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHor-tic.1986.190.21.

11. Macheka L, Speltc EJH, Bakkerb EJ, et al. Identification of determinants of postharvest losses in Zimbabwean tomato supply chains as basis for dedicated interventions. Food Control. 2019;87:135-144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.12.017.

12. Al-Dairi M, Pathare PB, Al-Yahyai R. Chemical and nutritional quality changes of tomato during post-harvest transportation and storage. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 2021;20(6):401-408. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.05.001.

13. McKenzie TJ, Singh-Peterson L, Un-derhill SJR. Quantifying Postharvest Loss and the Implication of Market-Based Decisions: A Case Study of Two Commercial Domestic Tomato Supply Chains in Queensland, Australia. Horticulturae. 2017;3(3):44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3030044.

14. Gudkovsky VA, Akishin DV, Nevzorova AV. Estimation of agricultural and technological methods of increasing tomato storage life. The Bulletin of Michurinsk State Agrarian University. 2011;(2-2):51-55. (In Russ.).


Login or Create
* Forgot password?