employee
Krasnodar, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
employee
employee from 01.01.2019 to 01.01.2025
Krasnodar, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
employee from 01.01.2017 to 01.01.2025
Krasnodar, Russian Federation
employee
VAK Russia 4.3.3
VAK Russia 4.1.1
VAK Russia 4.1.2
VAK Russia 4.1.3
VAK Russia 4.1.5
VAK Russia 4.2.1
VAK Russia 4.2.2
VAK Russia 4.2.3
VAK Russia 4.2.4
VAK Russia 4.2.5
VAK Russia 4.3.5
UDC 634.853
UDC 663.251
UDC 663.222
The aim of the study is to evaluate the influence of different terroirs on the physiological parameters of leaves, and the quality indicators of berries and wine from the domestic grape varieties Dmitriy, Vladimir and Kurchanskiy. The study was conducted in three different terroirs of various agro-ecological viticultural zones: the Central'naya Zone (CZ), Predgornaya (PZ), and Chernomorskaya (ChZ). The object of the study was technical grape varieties bred by the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution SKFNCSVV – Dmitriy, Vladimir and Kurchanskiy. The water content (WC) in grape leaves at all observation periods was highest in the Central'naya Zone – 72.6 % one month before harvest, 71.3 % during harvest, and lowest in the Predgornaya zone – 67.7 % during the first period, 63.3 % during the second period. The response of varieties to different terroir environments has varietal characteristics. The Kurchanskiy and Dmitriy varieties showed a 3.4 and 1.7 % increase in WC, respectively, in the Central'naya Zone. In the Predgornaya and Chernomorskaya zones, all varieties showed a decrease in leaf water content of 0.8–9.3 %. The mass concentration of sugars and titratable acidity varied depending on terroir conditions and varietal characte¬ristics.The Dmitriy variety in the Predgornaya zone had the highest sugar accumulation capacity (22.6 g/100 cm3), while the Kurchanskiy variety in the Chernomorskaya zone had 23.2 g/100 cm3. The Kurchanskiy variety in the Central zone had the lowest sugar content (19.4 g/100 cm3). The Central'naya zone had the lowest titratable acid content. The Dmitriy variety showed the greatest variability in phenolic content. Phenolic content was highest in wine samples from the Predgornaya zone and lower in those from the Central'naya zone. Wine samples from the Predgornaya and Chernomorskaya zones were of higher quality.
grapes, leaf water content, sugar concentration, titratable acids, tasting evaluation, phenolic substances
1. Moroz D. What does terroir mean? A science mapping of a multidimensional concept. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2024;75:889-913. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12607.
2. Van Leeuwen C, Seguin G. The concept of terroir in viticulture. Journal of Wine Research. 2006;17(1):1-10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260600633135.
3. Deloire A, Vaudour E, Carey VA, et al. Grapevine responses to terroir: a global approach. OENO One. 2005;39(4):149-162. DOI:https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2005.39.4.888.
4. Vaudour E. The Quality of Grapes and Wine in Relation to Geography: Notions of Terroir at Various Scales. Journal of Wine Research. 2002;13(2):117-141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0957126022000017981.
5. Priyadharshini D, Muthuvel I, Saraswathy S, et al. Terroir unveiled: the interplay of environment, microbes, and craft in wine making. Eur Food Res Techno., 2025;251:1489-1498. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-025-04750-w.
6. Franco GC, Leiva J, Nand S, et al. Soil Microbial Communities and Wine Terroir: Research Gaps and Data Needs. Foods, 2024;13:2475. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162475.
7. van Leeuwen C, Roby J-P, de Rességuier L. Soil-related terroir factors: a review. OENO One. 2018;52(2):173-188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2018.52.2.2208.
8. Vingiani S, Capozzi F, Gambuti A, et al. Elemental profile and enological characteristics of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Aglianico grapes from a quality wine terroir in southern Italy: relationship with soil composition and chemical properties. Food Chemistry. 2024;492(3):145433. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.food-chem.2025.145433.
9. Belfiore N, Amato A, Gardiman M, et al. The Role of Terroir on the Ripening Traits of V. vinifera cv ‘Glera’ in the Prosecco Area. Plants. 2024;13:816. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13060816.
10. Marque C, Dinis LT, Modesti M, et al. Exploring the influence of terroir on douro white and red wines characteristics: a study of human perception and electronic analysis. Eur Food Res Technol, 2024;250:3011-3027. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-024-04607-8.
11. Çelebi Uzkuç NM, Uzkuç H, Kavdır Y, et al. Soil-driven terroir: Impacts on Vitis vinifera L. 'Karasakiz' wine quality and phenolic composition. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2025;142:107444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107444.
12. Bouloumpasi E, Skendi A, Karampatea A, et al. Exploring Red Wines from the Drama Region: A Chemical, Sensory, and Terroir Insight. Appl. Sci. 2025;15:2485. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052485.
13. Tomić N, Ninkov J, Milić S, et al. Power of Terroir: Case study of Grašac at the Fruška Gora wine region (North Serbia). Open Geosciences. 2024;16:20220701. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0701.
14. Schmidtke LM, Bastian SEP, Bindon K, et al. Exploring Interactions Between Vineyard Perfor-mance, Grape and Wine Composition and Subregional Boundaries – The Terroir of Barossa Shiraz. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 2024;1:2622516. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/ajgw/2622516.
15. Fourment M, Tachini R, Bonnardot V, et al. Assessment of Albariño (Vitis vinifera sp.) plasticity to local climate in the Atlantic eastern coastal terroir of Uruguay. OENO One. 2024;58:hal-05072901. DOI:https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.4.8196.
16. Zhang X, Yang H, Liu N. Chemical and sensory properties of young cabernet sauvignon and marse-lan wines from subregions on the eastern foothills of helan mountains in ningxia, China: Terroir ef-fect. Food Chemistry: X, 2025;25:102191. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102191.
17. Manatskov AG, Lopatkina EV, Zimin GV. Influence of the terroirs of the Nizhnekundryuchenskiy sandy massif on the development features of the autochthonous Don grape variety Sibirkovyi. Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia. 2025;92:59-66. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30679/2219-5335-2025-2-92-59-66.
18. Naumenko VV, Lopatkina EV. Characteristics of the viticultural area "Donetsk-Kundryuchenskiy sandy massif" and terroirs on it. Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia. 2020;66:98-122. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30679/2219-5335-2020-6-66-98-122.
19. Tolokov NR, Zimin GV. Features of traditional terroir of grape variety krasnostop zolotovskiy. Rus-sian grapes. 2015;2:84-91. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VKVYCB.
20. Romanenko ES, Esaulko NA, Selivanov MV, et al. Assessment of agro-climatic indicators of grape and wine terroirs of the Stavropol territory for obtaining high-quality wine products with a protected geographical indication and a protected appellation of origin. Agricultural Bulletin of Stavropol Re-gion. 2022;2:39-45. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.31279/2222-9345-2022-11-46-39-45.
21. Antonenko MV, Guguchkina TI, Antonenko OP. Systematization of physiological and chemical para-meters of white and pink wines of Kuban for the purpose of their geographical identification. Scientific Works of NCFSCHVW. 2023;36:226-230. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30679/2587-9847-2023-36-226-230.
22. Antonenko MV, Antonenko OP, Guguchkina TI, et al. Comprehensive assessment of wines of the geographical zone “Kuban. Gelendzhik”. Izvestiya vuzov. Food Technology. 2023;1:72-78. (In Russ). DOI:https://doi.org/10.26297/0579-3009.2023.1.11.
23. Antonenko OP, Guguchkina TI, Sheludko ON, et al. Research of wines with geographical status produced by Shumrinka LLC. Bulletin of KSAU, 2023;11:258-267. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2023-11-258-267.
24. Filella I, Llusia J, Pinol J, et al. Leaf gas exchange and fluorescence of Phillyrea latifolia, Pistacia lentiscus and Quercus ilex saplings in severe drought and high temperature conditions. Environ-mental and Experimental Botany. 1998;39:213-220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(97)00045-2.
25. Viljevac Vuletić M, Mihaljević I, Tomaš V, et al. Physiological Response to Short-Term Heat Stress in the Leaves of Traditional and Modern Plum (Prunus domestica L.) Cultivars. Horticulturae. 2022;8:72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8010072.
26. Dionisio-Sese ML, Tobita S. Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Science. 1998;135:1-9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00025-9.
27. Antonenko OP, Guguchkina TI, Ageeva N.M, et al. Investigation of the phenol components of dry red wine materials from promising grape varieties. Vinodelie i vinogradarstvo. 2014;5:28-30. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TJUNOT.
28. Markosov VA, Ageeva NM, Zajcev GP, et al. Investigation of phenolic substances in Pinot Noir grapes and wines made from them. «Magarach». Viticulture and Winemaking. 2023;25:71-77. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.34919/IM.2023.25.1.010.
29. Boulet J, Ducasse M, Cheynier V. Ultraviolet spectroscopy study of phenolic substances and other major compounds in red wines: relationship between astringency and the concentration of phenolic substances: UV spectroscopy of red wine components. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Re-search. 2017;23(2):193-199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12265.
